288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
|
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
|
-
+
|
style license]. It is not our purpose here to try to persuade you to make
the same choice of license that we did. Neither license affects the
managed repository contents. However, we do believe the choice of
license affected the design and implementation of these two DVCSes,
which may affect your choice when deciding which one you'd rather use.
The GPL allows a project to do without a
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributor_License_Agreement|constributor
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributor_License_Agreement|contributor
license agreement] (CLA) because by the very act of distributing
binaries, you are bound to also distribute the source under a compatible
license. There are GPL-based projects that do require a CLA, but this is
usually done to further commercial interests rather than to maintain
the legal integrity of the
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software|FOSS]
project itself.
|