@@ -1,75 +1,75 @@
-To: melenk
-cc: hearn
-Subject: Help Materiall
-
-Herbert, many thanks for all your work.  Below are some brief comments on
-your message about this.
-
-I've updated my files as I've explained below.  Should I send you a new
-set?
-
-Thanks,
-Tony
-
--------------------------------
-
-> numeric.tex
-
-> I don't like the heading of this chapter, as most of the
-> operators described here are more general than just
-> numeric. How about "Arithmetic Operators?"
-
-Fine with me.  I've renamed the file "arith.tex" too.
-
----------------------------------------------------------
-
-> REMAINDER:
-
-> remainder(sin(2*x),x*y);                        &         SIN(2*X)
-> If the first argument to \name{remainder} is not a polynomial, an error
-> occurs.
-
-> Here the example and the comment contradict each other
->    sin(2*x) is *not* a polynomial
-
-How about "is not a polynomial in its constituent kernels"?
-
----------------------------------------------------------
-
-> command.tex
-
-> not very important, but is WS a command? I would prefer
-> an operator because its main purpose is to deliver a value.
-
-You're right.  I've moved it to algebra.tex.
-
-----------------------------------------------------------
-
-algebra.tex
-
-RESULTANT: please have a look at the TEX-parts: I think that
-the 2nd polynomial should have a different degree (namely m
-as in the INFO parts).
-
-It is wrong.  However,
-the index on "a" should be m (as per Buchberger, Collins and Loos).
-
-----------------------------------------------------------
-
-switch.tex
-
-> SOLVESINGULAR:
-
-> This switch seems to have no effect at all. At least the
-> example doesn't work. Is that a bug in solve or should
-> we remove this switch??
-
-This was a bug --- I hadn't considered this in the new solvelnr module.
-
----------
-
-Now a question from me:
-
-Should we move the single switch ADJPREC from "arith"
-to "switch", or should we move some of the entries in
-"switch" to other sections?
+To: melenk
+cc: hearn
+Subject: Help Materiall
+
+Herbert, many thanks for all your work.  Below are some brief comments on
+your message about this.
+
+I've updated my files as I've explained below.  Should I send you a new
+set?
+
+Thanks,
+Tony
+
+-------------------------------
+
+> numeric.tex
+
+> I don't like the heading of this chapter, as most of the
+> operators described here are more general than just
+> numeric. How about "Arithmetic Operators?"
+
+Fine with me.  I've renamed the file "arith.tex" too.
+
+---------------------------------------------------------
+
+> REMAINDER:
+
+> remainder(sin(2*x),x*y);                        &         SIN(2*X)
+> If the first argument to \name{remainder} is not a polynomial, an error
+> occurs.
+
+> Here the example and the comment contradict each other
+>    sin(2*x) is *not* a polynomial
+
+How about "is not a polynomial in its constituent kernels"?
+
+---------------------------------------------------------
+
+> command.tex
+
+> not very important, but is WS a command? I would prefer
+> an operator because its main purpose is to deliver a value.
+
+You're right.  I've moved it to algebra.tex.
+
+----------------------------------------------------------
+
+algebra.tex
+
+RESULTANT: please have a look at the TEX-parts: I think that
+the 2nd polynomial should have a different degree (namely m
+as in the INFO parts).
+
+It is wrong.  However,
+the index on "a" should be m (as per Buchberger, Collins and Loos).
+
+----------------------------------------------------------
+
+switch.tex
+
+> SOLVESINGULAR:
+
+> This switch seems to have no effect at all. At least the
+> example doesn't work. Is that a bug in solve or should
+> we remove this switch??
+
+This was a bug --- I hadn't considered this in the new solvelnr module.
+
+---------
+
+Now a question from me:
+
+Should we move the single switch ADJPREC from "arith"
+to "switch", or should we move some of the entries in
+"switch" to other sections?