Artifact 0c410305799a7f1e45c15f1d2da929826d940ec6aaa7b09b830384d98ead6c9d:
- Executable file
r36/help/HERBERT.MSG
— part of check-in
[f2fda60abd]
at
2011-09-02 18:13:33
on branch master
— Some historical releases purely for archival purposes
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/reduce-algebra/code/trunk/historical@1375 2bfe0521-f11c-4a00-b80e-6202646ff360 (user: arthurcnorman@users.sourceforge.net, size: 4937) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using] [more...]
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 93 16:15:43 +0100 From: melenk@sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (Herbert Melenk) Subject: help milestone Finally I'm done with the help material. It took me much longer as originally expected, but I think that the result justifies the effort. Please pick up the following data sets: 408064: /silo/herbert/redhelp/redref/helptar.Z these are the .tex files 230217 /silo/herbert/redhelp/redref.hlp.Z the windows binary help file 325179 /silo/herbert/redhelp/txt/txttar.Z the bare ascii documents thanks to Rainer. If you want to have a look at the hypertext connections as implemented in the windows help file: - uncompress under unix - move the .hlp file to a DOS-Windows (or NT) machine - do one of (1) double click it with the windows file manager, (2) (NT only) enter the command line winhelp redref.hlp (3) install an icon with title REDUCE reference and command line winhelp <dir>\redref.hlp where <dir> is the path, and then double click the yellow question mark. Mode (3) allows one to have the book as on line document available independent of a reduce session. That is how Microsoft deliver deliver their system documentation. Please have also a look at the index which I have built partially automatically, partially by inserting lots of \index statements. E.g. push the Search button and then enter polynomial (or any other central item) as search item. ================================================================ When working on the material I first had started to keep track of any modification, but I gave that up rather soon. I have modified several formats - latex accepts the object still, bit I didn't look at the dvi output. 330 is too much for printing anyway. General remarks regarding the information: In some places I have modified the REDUCE kernel material substantially. I am sure that you will find better words for these points - I am happy with *any* improvement. I ran spell on the data sets, but that does not find bad grammar or wrong words. Substantial points are: SOLVE+its sub-operators and switches ARBINT ARBCOMPLEX ROOT_OF ONE_OF EXPAND_CASES FULLROOTS FULLPREC RULE (new type) LET, WHEN, WHERE EQUATION BLOCK TRUE ====================================================== some details: --------------------------------------------------------- numeric.tex I don't like the heading of this chapter, as most of the operators described here are more general than just numeric. How about "Arithmetic Operators?" --------------------------------------------------------- REMAINDER: remainder(sin(2*x),x*y); & SIN(2*X) \end{Examples} \begin{Comments} If the first argument to \name{remainder} is not a polynomial, an error occurs. > Here the example and the comment contradict each other > sin(2*x) is *not* a polynomial >>>> not repaired (I have no idea what to write here) -------------------------------------------------------- boolean.tex I have introduced a node which explains the meaning of "true". This also could be a member of a "glossary". The description of NOT \meta{logical expression} must evaluate to {\it true} or {\it nil}. is too restrictive. I have deleted this line. ---------------------------------------------------------- command.tex not very important, but is WS a command? I would prefer an operator because its main purpose is to deliver a value. ---------------------------------------------------------- algebra.tex RESULTANT: please have a look at the TEX-parts: I think that the 2nd polynomial should have a different degree (namely m as in the INFO parts). SOLVE: You sell SOLVE below its facilities. According to the original description the following examples would fail: 8: solve({x+y=1,x+2y=2,2x+3y=3},{x,y}); {{x=0,y=1}} 9: solve({x+y+z=1,x-y-z=1},{x,y,z}); {{x=1,y= - arbcomplex(4),z=arbcomplex(4)}} Fortunately they don't! I have commented these restrictions in the description. -------------------------------------------------------- switch.tex RATIONAL: The \nameref{factorize} command does not accept polynomials with rational coefficients. > this is not true! I have commented this lines. SOLVESINGULAR: This switch seems to have no effect at all. At least the example doesn't work. Is that a bug in solve or should we remove this switch?? ============================================================= matrix.tex Cofactor had a completely different syntax style ============================================================= library.tex : upgraded from the current manual ======== EOF ===============================================