JSON API: General Conventions
Not logged in

(⬑JSON API Index)

Jump to:


JSON Property Naming

Since most JSON usage conventionally happens in JavaScript environments, this API has (without an explicit decision ever having been made) adopted the ubiquitous JavaScript convention of camelCaseWithStartingLower for naming properties in JSON objects.

HTTP GET Requests

Many (if not most) requests can be made via simple GET requests, e.g. we could use any of the following patterns for a hypothetical JSON-format timeline:

  • https://..../timeline/json
  • /timeline?format=json
  • /timeline?json=1
  • /timeline.json
  • /json/timeline?...options...

The API settled on the /json/... convention, primarily because it simplifies dispatching and argument-handling logic compared to the /[.../]foo.json approach. Using /json/... allows us to unify that logic for all JSON sub-commands, for both CLI and HTTP modes.

HTTP Post Requests

Certain requests, mainly things like editing checkin messages and committing new files entirely, require POST data. This is fundamentally very simple to do - clients post plain/unencoded JSON using a common wrapper envelope which contains the request-specific data to submit as well as some request-independent information (like authentication data).

POST Request Envelope

POST requests are sent to the same URL as their GET counterpart (if any, else their own path), and are sent as plain-text/unencoded JSON wrapped in a common request envelope with the following properties:

  • requestId: Optional arbitrary JSON value, not used by fossil, but returned as-is in responses.
  • command: Provides a secondary mechanism for specifying which JSON command should be run. A request path of /json/foo/bar is equivalent to a request with path=/json and command=foo/bar. Note that subpaths do not work this way. e.g. path=/json/foo, command=bar will not work, but path=/json, command=foo/bar will. This option is particularly useful when generating JSON for piping in to CLI mode, but it also has some response-dispatching uses on the client side.
  • authToken: Authentication token. Created by a login request. Determines what access rights the user has, and any given request may require specific rights. In principle this is required by any request which needs non-guest privileges, but cookie-aware clients do not manually need to track this (it is managed as a cookie by the agent/browser).
    • Note that when accessing fossil over a local server instance which was started with the --localauth flag, the authToken will be ignored and need not be sent with any requests. The user will automatically be given full privileges, as if they were using CLI mode.
  • payload: Command-specific parameters. Most can optionally come in via GET parameters, but those taking complex structures expect them to be placed here.
  • indent: Optionally specifies indentation for the output. 0=no indention. 1=a single TAB character for each level of indentation. >1 means that many spaces per level. e.g. indent=7 means to indent 7 spaces per object/array depth level. cson also supports other flags for fine-tuning the output spacing, and adding them to this interface might be interesting at some point. e.g. whether or not to add a newline to the output. CLI mode adds extra indentation by default, whereas CGI/server modes produce unindented output by default.
  • jsonp: Optional String (client function name). Requests which include this will be returned with Content-Type application/javascript and will be wrapped up in a function call using the given name. e.g. if jsonp=foo then the result would look like:
    foo( {...the response envelope...} )

The API allows most of those (normally all but the payload) to come in as either GET parameters or properties of the top-level POSTed request JSON envelope, with GET taking priority over POST. (Reminder to self: we could potentially also use values from cookies. Fossil currently only uses 1 cookie (the login token), and i'd prefer to keep it that way.)

POST requests without such an envelope will be rejected, generating a Fossil/JSON error response (as opposed to an HTTP error response). GET requests, by definition, never have an envelope.

POSTed client requests must send a Content-Type header of either application/json , application/javascript, or text/plain, or the JSON-handling code will never see the POST data. The POST handler optimistically assumes that type text/plain "might be JSON", since application/json is a newer convention which many existing clients do not use (as of the time these docs were written, back in 2011).

POST Envelope vs. POST.payload

When this document refers to POST data, it is referring to top-level object in JSON-format POSTed input data. When we say POST.payload we refer to the "payload" property of the POST data. While fossil's core handles form-urlencoded POST data, if such data is sent in then parsing it as JSON cannot succeed, which means that (at worst) the JSON-mode bits will "not see" any POST data. Data POSTed to the JSON API must be sent non-form-urlencoded (i.e. as plain text).

Framework-level configuration options are always set via the top-level POST envelope object or GET parameters. Request-specific options are set either in POST.payload or GET parameters (though the former is required in some cases). Here is an example which demonstrates the possibly not-so-obvious difference between the two types of options (framework vs. request-specific):

{
"requestId":"my request", // standard envelope property (optional)
"command": "timeline/wiki", // also standard
"indent":2, // output indention is a framework-level option
"payload":{ // *anything* in the payload is request-specific
   "limit":1
}
}

When a given parameter is set in two places, e.g. GET and POST, or POST-from-a-file and CLI parameters, which one takes precedence depends on the concrete command handler (and may be unspecified). Most will give precedence to CLI and GET parameters, but POSTed values are technically preferred for non-string data because no additional "type guessing" or string-to-whatever conversion has to be made (GET/CLI parameters are always strings, even if they look like a number or boolean).

Request Parameter Data Types

When parameters are sent in the form of GET or CLI arguments, they are inherently strings. When they come in from JSON they keep their full type (boolean, number, etc.). All parameters in this API specify what type (or types) they must (or may) be. For strings, there is no internal conversion/interpretation needed for GET- or CLI-provided parameters, but for other types we sometimes have to convert strings to other atomic types. This section describes how those string-to-whatever conversions behave.

No higher-level constructs, e.g. JSON arrays or objects, are accepted in string form. Such parameters must be set in the POST envelope or payload, as specified by the specific API.

This API does not currently use any floating-point parameters, but does return floating-point results in a couple places.

For integer parameters we use a conventional string-to-int algorithm and assume base 10 (analog to atoi(3)). The API may err on the side of usability when given technically invalid values. e.g. "123abc" will likely be interpreted as the integer 123. No APIs currently rely on integer parameters with more than 32 bits (signedness is call-dependent but few, if any, use negative values).

Boolean parameters are a bit schizophrenic...

In CLI mode, boolean flags do not have a value, per se, and thus require no string-to-bool conversion. e.g. fossil foo -aBoolOpt -non-bool-opt value.

Those which arrive as strings via GET parameters treat any of the following as true: a string starting with a character in the set [1-9tT]. All other string values are considered to be false for this purpose.

Those which are part of the POST data are normally (but not always - it depends on the exact context) evaluated as the equivalent of JavaScript booleans. e.g. if we have POST.envelope.foo="f", and evaluate it as a JSON boolean (as opposed to a string-to-bool conversion), the result will be true because the underlying JSON API follows JavaScript semantics for any-type-to-bool conversions. As long as clients always send "proper" booleans in their POST data, the difference between GET/CLI-provided booleans should never concern them.

TODO: consider changing the GET-value-to-bool semantics to match the JS semantics, for consistency (within the JSON API at least, but that might cause inconsistencies vis-a-vis the HTML interface).

Response Envelope

Every response comes in the form of a HTTP response or (in CLI mode) JSON sent to stdout. The body of the response is a JSON object following a common envelope format. The envelope has the following properties:

  • fossil: Fossil server version string. This property is basically "the official response envelope marker" - if it is set, clients can "probably safely assume" that the object indeed came from one of the Fossil/JSON APIs. This API never creates responses which do not contain this property.
  • requestId: Only set if the request contained it, and then it is echoed back to the caller as-is. This can be use to determine (client-side) which request a given response is coming in for (assuming multiple asynchronous requests are pending). In practice this generally isn’t needed because response handling tends to be done by closures associated with the original request object (at least in JavaScript code). In languages without closures it might have some use. It may be any legal JSON value - it need not be confined to a string or number.
  • resultCode: Standardized result code string in the form FOSSIL-####. Only error responses contain a resultCode.
  • resultText: Possibly a descriptive string, possibly empty. Supplements the resultCode, but can also be set on success responses (but normally isn't). Clients must not rely on any specific values being set here.
  • payload: Request-specific response payload (data type/structure is request-specific). The payload is never set for error responses, only for success responses (and only those which actually have a payload - not all do).
  • timestamp: Response timestamp (GMT Unix Epoch). We use seconds precision because i did not know at the time that Fossil actually records millisecond precision.
  • payloadVersion: Not initially needed, but reserved for future use in maintaining version compatibility when the format of a given response type's payload changes. If needed, the "first version" value is assumed to be 0, for semantic [near-]compatibility with the undefined value clients see when this property is not set.
  • command: Normalized form of the command being run. It consists of the "command" (non-argument) parts of the request path (or CLI positional arguments), excluding the initial "/json/" part. e.g. the "command" part of "/json/timeline/checkin?a=b" (CLI: json timeline checkin...) is "timeline/checkin" (both in CLI and HTTP modes).
  • apiVersion: Not yet used, but reserved for a numeric value which represents the JSON API's version (which can be used to determine if it has a given feature or not). This will not be implemented until it's needed.
  • warnings: Reserved for future use as a standard place to put non-fatal warnings in responses. Will be an array but the warning structure/type is not yet specified. Intended primarily as a debugging tool, and will "probably not" become part of the public client interface.
  • g: Fossil administrators (those with the "a" or "s" permissions) may set the debugFossilG boolean request parameter (CLI: --json-debug-g) to enable this property for any given response. It contains a good deal of the server-side internal state at the time the response was generated, which is often useful in debuggering problems. Trivia: it is called "g" because that's the name of fossil's internal global state object.
  • procTimeMs: For debugging only - generic clients must not rely on this property. Contains the number of milliseconds the JSON command processor needed to dispatch and process the command. TODO: move the timer into the fossil core so that we can generically time its responses and include the startup overhead in the time calculation.

HTTP Response Headers

The Content-Type HTTP header of a response will be either application/json, application/javascript, or text/plain, depending on whether or not we are in JSONP mode or (failing that) the contents of the "Accept" header sent in the request. The response type will be text/plain if it cannot figure out what to do. The response's Content-Type header may contain additional metadata, e.g. it might look like: application/json; charset=utf-8

Apropos UTF-8: note that JSON is, by definition, Unicode and recommends UTF-8 encoding (which is what we use). That means if your console cannot handle UTF-8 then using this API in CLI mode might (depending on the content) render garbage on your screen.

CLI vs. HTTP Mode

CLI (command-line interface) and HTTP modes (CGI and standalone server) are consolidated in the same implementations and behave essentially identically, with only minor exceptions.

An HTTP path of /json/foo translates to the CLI command fossil json foo. CLI mode takes options in the fossil-convention forms (e.g. --foo 3 or -f 3) whereas HTTP mode takes them via GET/POST data (e.g. ?foo=1). (Note that per long-standing fossil convention CLI parameters taking a value do not use an equal sign before the value!)

For example:

  • HTTP: /json/timeline/wiki?after=2011-09-01&limit=3
  • CLI: fossil json timeline wiki --after 2011-09-01 --limit 3

Some commands may only work in one mode or the other (for various reasons). In CLI mode the user automatically has full setup/admin access.

In HTTP mode, request-specific options can also be specified in the POST.payload data, and doing so actually has an advantage over specifying them as URL parameters: posting JSON data retains the full type information of the values, whereas GET-style parameters are always strings and must be explicitly type-checked/converted (which may produce unpredictable results when given invalid input). That said, oftentimes it is more convenient to pass the options via URL parameters, rather than generate the request envelope and payload required by POST requests, and the JSON API makes some extra effort to treat GET-style parameters type-equivalent to their POST counterparts. If a property appears in both GET and POST.payload, GET-style parameters typically take precedence over POST.payload by long-standing convention (=="PHP does it this way by default").

(That is, however, subject to eventual reversal because of the stronger type safety provided by POSTed JSON. Philosophically speaking, though, GET should take precedence, in the same way that CLI-provided options conventionally override app-configuration-level options.)

One notable functional difference between CLI and HTTP modes is that in CLI mode error responses might be accompanied by a non-0 exit status (they "should" always be, but there might be cases where that does not yet happen) whereas in HTTP mode we always try to exit with code 0 to avoid generating an HTTP 500 ("internal server error"), which could keep the JSON response from being delivered. The JSON code only intentionally allows an HTTP 500 when there is a serious internal error like allocation or assertion failure. HTTP clients are expected to catch errors by evaluating the response object, not the HTTP result code.

Simulating POSTed data

We have a mechanism to feed request data to CLI mode via files (simulating POSTed data), as demonstrated in this example:

$ cat in.json
{ "command": "timeline/wiki", "indent":2, "payload":{"limit":1}}
$ fossil json --json-input in.json # use filename - for stdin

The above is equivalent to:

$ echo '{"indent":2, "payload":{"limit":1}}' \
 | fossil json timeline wiki --json-input -

Note that the "command" JSON parameter is only checked when no json subcommand is provided on the CLI or via the HTTP request path. Thus we cannot pass the CLI args "json timeline" in conjunction with a "command" string of "wiki" this way.

HOWEVER...

Much of the existing JSON code was written before the --json-input option was possible. Because of this, there might be some "misinteractions" when providing request-specific options via both CLI options and simulated POST data. Those cases will eventually be ironed out (with CLI options taking precedence). Until then, when "POSTing" data in CLI mode, for consistent/predictible results always provide any options via the JSON request data, not CLI arguments. That said, there "should not" be any blatant incompatibilities, but some routines will prefer POST.payload over CLI/GET arguments, so there are some minor inconsistencies across various commands with regards to which source (POST/GET/CLI) takes precedence for a given option. The precedence "should always be the same," but currently cannot be due to core fossil implementation details (the internal consolidation of GET/CLI/POST vars into a single set).

Indentation/Formatting of JSON Output

CLI mode accepts the --indent|-I # option to set the indention level and HTTP mode accepts indent=# as a GET/POST parameter. The semantics of the indention level are derived from the underlying JSON library and have the following meanings: 0 (zero) or less disables all superfluous indentation (this is the default in HTTP mode). A value of 1 uses 1 hard TAB character (ASCII 0x09) per level of indention (the default in CLI mode). Values greater than 1 use that many whitespaces (ASCII 32d) per level of indention. e.g. a value of 7 uses 7 spaces per level of indention. There is no way to specify one whitespace per level, but if you really want one whitespace instead of one tab (same data size) you can filter the output to globally replace ASCII 9dec (TAB) with ASCII 32dec (space). Because JSON string values never contain hard tabs (they are represented by \t) there is no chance that such a global replacement will corrupt JSON string contents - only the formatting will be affected.

Potential TODO: because extraneous indention "could potentially" be used as a form DoS, the option might be subject to later removed from HTTP mode (in CLI it's fine).

In HTTP mode no trailing newline is added to the output, whereas in CLI mode one is normally appended (exception: in JSONP mode no newline is appended, to (rather pedantically and arbitraily) allow the client to add a semicolon at the end if he likes). There is currently no option to control the newline behaviour, but the underlying JSON code supports this option, so adding it to this API is just a matter of adding the CLI/HTTP args for it.

Pedantic note: internally the indention level is stored as a single byte, so giving large indention values will cause harmless numeric overflow (with only cosmetic effects), meaning, e.g., 257 will overflow to the value 1.

Potential TODO: consider changing cson's indention mechanism to use a signed number, using negative values for tabs and positive for whitespace count (or the other way around). This would require more doc changes than code changes :/.

JSONP

The API supports JSONP-style output. The caller specifies the callback name and the JSON response will be wrapped in a function call to that name. For HTTP mode pass the jsonp=string option (via GET or POST envelope) and for CLI use --jsonp string.

For example, if we pass the JSONP name myCallback then a response will look like:

myCallback({...response...})

Note that fossil does not evaluate the callback name itself, other than to verify that it is-a string, so "garbage in, garbage out," and all that. (Remember that CLI and GET parameters are always strings, even if they look like numbers.)

API Result Codes

Result codes are strings which tell the client whether or not a given API call succeeded or failed, and if it failed perhaps some hint as to why it failed.

The result code is available via the resultCode property of every error response envelope. Since having a result code value for success responses is somewhat redundant, success responses contain no resultCode property. In practice this simplifies error checking on the client side.

The codes are strings in the form FOSSIL-####, where #### is a 4-digit integral number, left-padded with zeros. The numbers follow these conventions:

  • The number 0000 is reserved for the "not an error" (OK) case. Since success responses do not contain a result code, clients won't see this value (except in documentation).
  • All numbers with a leading 0 are reserved for potential future use in reporting non-fatal warnings.
  • Despite possibly having leading zeros, the numbers are decimal, not octal. Script code which uses eval() or similar to produce integers from them may need to take that into account.
  • The 1000ths and 100ths places of the number describe the general category of the error, e.g. authentication- vs. database- vs. usage errors. The 100ths place is more specific than the 1000ths place, allowing two levels of sub-categorization (which "should be enough" for this purpose). This separation allows the server administrator to configure the level of granularity of error reporting. e.g. some admins consider error messages to be security-relevant and like to "dumb them down" on their way to the client, whereas developers normally want to see very specific error codes when tracking down a problem. We can offer a configuration option to "dumb down" error codes to their generic category by simply doing a modulo 100 (or 1000) against the native error code number. e.g. FOSSIL-1271 could (via a simple modulo) be reduced to FOSSIL-1200 or FOSSIL-1000, depending on the paranoia level of the sysadmin. i have tried to order the result code numbers so that a dumb-down level of 2 provides reasonably usable results without giving away too much detail to malicious clients. (TODO: g.json.errorDetailParanoia is used to set the default dumb-down level, but it is currently set at compile-time. It needs to be moved to a config option. We have a chicken/egg scenario with error reporting and db access there (where the config is stored).)
  • Once a number is assigned to a given error condition (and actually used somewhere), it may not be changed/redefined. JSON clients need to be able to rely on stable result codes in order to provide adequate error reporting to their clients, and possibly for some error recovery logic as well (i.e. to decide whether to abort or retry).

The tentative list of result codes is shown in the following table. These numbers/ranges are "nearly arbitrarily" chosen except for the "special" value 0000.

Maintenance reminder: these codes are defined in src/json_detail.h (enum FossilJsonCodes) and assigned default resultText values in src/json.c:json_err_cstr(). Changes there need to be reflected here (and vice versa). Also, we have assertions in place to ensure that C-side codes are in the range 1000-9999, so do not just go blindly change the numeric ranges used by the enum.

FOSSIL-0###: Non-error Category

  • FOSSIL-0000: Success/not an error. Succesful responses do not contain a resultCode, so clients should never see this.
  • FOSSIL-0###: Reserved for potential future use in reporting non-fatal warnings.

FOSSIL-1000: Generic Errors Category

  • FOSSIL-1101: Invalid request. Request envelope is invalid or missing.
  • FOSSIL-1102: Unknown JSON command.
  • FOSSIL-1103: Unknown/unspecified error
  • FOSSIL-1104: RE-USE
  • FOSSIL-1105: A server-side timeout was reached. (i’m not sure we can actually implement this one, though.)
  • FOSSIL-1106: Assertion failed (or would have had we continued). Note: if an assert() fails in CGI/server modes, the HTTP response will be code 500 (Internal Server Error). We want to avoid that and return a JSON response instead. All of that said - there seems to be little reason to implementi this, since assertions are "truly serious" errors.
  • FOSSIL-1107: Allocation/out of memory error. This cannot be reasonably reported because fossil aborts if an allocation fails.
  • FOSSIL-1108: Requested API is not yet implemented.
  • FOSSIL-1109: Panic! Fossil's fossil_panic() or cgi_panic() was called. In non-JSON HTML mode this produces an HTTP 500 error. Clients "should" report this as a potential bug, as it "possibly" indicates that the C code has incorrect argument- or error handling somewhere.
  • FOSSIL-1110: Reading of artifact manifest failed. Time to contact your local fossil guru.
  • FOSSIL-1111: Opening of file failed (e.g. POST data provided to CLI mode).

FOSSIL-2000: Authentication/Access Error Category

  • FOSSIL-2001: Privileged request was missing authentication token/cookie.
  • FOSSIL-2002: Access to requested resource was denied. Oftentimes the resultText property will contain a human-language description of the access rights needed for the given command.
  • FOSSIL-2003: Requested command is not available in the current operating mode. Returned in CLI mode by commands which require HTTP mode (e.g. login), and vice versa. FIXME: now that we can simulate POST in CLI mode, we can get rid of this distinction for some of the commands.
  • FOSSIL-2100: Login Failed.
  • FOSSIL-2101: Anonymous login attempt is missing the "anonymousSeed" property (fetched via the /json/anonymousPassword request). Note that this is more specific form of FOSSIL-3002.

ONLY FOR TESTING purposes should the remaning 210X sub-codes be enabled (they are potentially security-relevant, in that the client knows which part of the request was valid/invalid):

  • FOSSIL-2102: Name not supplied in login request
  • FOSSIL-2103: Password not supplied in login request
  • FOSSIL-2104: No name/password match found

FOSSIL-3000: Usage Error Category

  • FOSSIL-3001: Invalid argument/parameter type(s) or value(s) in request
  • FOSSIL-3002: Required argument(s)/parameter(s) missing from request
  • FOSSIL-3003: Requested resource identifier is ambiguous (e.g. a shortened hash that matches multiple artifacts, an abbreviated date that matches multiple commits, etc.)
  • FOSSIL-3004: Unresolved resource identifier. A branch/tag/uuid provided by client code could not be resolved. This is a special case of #3006.
  • FOSSIL-3005: Resource already exists and overwriting/replacing is not allowed. e.g. trying to create a wiki page or user which already exists. FIXME? Consolidate this and resource-not-found into a separate category for dumb-down purposes?
  • FOSSIL-3006: Requested resource not found. e.g artifact ID, branch name, etc.

FOSSIL-4000: Database-related Error Category

  • FOSSIL-4001: Statement preparation failed.
  • FOSSIL-4002: Parameter binding failed.
  • FOSSIL-4003: Statement execution failed.
  • FOSSIL-4004: Database locked (this is not used anywhere, but reserved for future use).

Special-case DB-related errors...

  • FOSSIL-4101: Fossil Schema out of date (repo rebuild required).
  • FOSSIL-4102: Fossil repo db could not be found.
  • FOSSIL-4103: Repository db is not valid (possibly corrupt).
  • FOSSIL-4104: Check-out not found. This is similar to FOSSIL-4102 but indicates that a local checkout is required (but was not found). Note that the 4102 gets triggered earlier than this one, and so can appear in cases when a user might otherwise expect a 4104 error.

Some of those error codes are of course "too detailed" for the client to do anything with (e.g.. 4001-4004), but their intention is to make it easier for Fossil developers to (A) track down problems and (B) support clients who report problems. If a client reports, "I get a FOSSIL-4000, how can I fix it?" then the developers/support personnel can't say much unless they know if it's a 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, or 4101 (in which case they can probably zero in on the problem fairly quickly, since they know which API call triggered it and they know (from the error code) the general source of the problem).

Why Standard/Immutable Result Codes are Important

  • They are easily internationalized (i.e. associated with non-English error text)
  • Clients may be able to add automatic retry strategies for certain problem types by examining the result code. e.g. if fossil returns a locking or timeout error [it currently does no special timeout/locking handling, by the way] the client could re-try, whereas a usage error cannot be sensibly retried with the same inputs.
  • The "category" structure described above allows us some degree of flexibility in how detailed the reported errors are reported.
  • While the string prefix "FOSSIL-" on the error codes may seem superfluous, it has one minor potential advantage on the client side: when managing several unrelated data sources, these error codes can be immediately identified (by higher-level code which may be ignorant of the data source) as having come from the fossil API. Think "ORA-111" vs. "111".